🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". A law may be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," said a leading MEP driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," stated a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, regulation is mostly happening at the state level amid federal inaction.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating parental consent for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to copy the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of this nation and others show that governments around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.